Asrock H81M-HG4 R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HG4 R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime11 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 18:39
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 162
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 221
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
ASRock(1849 041E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 4.2
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD WIN MEMORY 2 5 120 GB 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN010754
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 377 377 369 323 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.1% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 437
Mixed 438
SusWrite 319
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 40.8
144% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 153
130% 184 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD301GNSA-CA3G1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 32 60 19.4" 1280 720 ACR051A Acer V206HQLB
Typical H81M-HG4 R4.0 Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HG4 R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback