Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Raider GE76 12UHS
MotherboardMSI MS-17K4  (all builds)
Memory41.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230626
Uptime20.8 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 03:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 62.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 329
98% 190 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 857
90% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,227
76% 1,227 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 86%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 1324) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23
Parallax 22.2
16% 21.7 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 17.7
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2276 1616 1624 1600 1596 1609 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,410
Write 3,011
Mixed 2,803
SusWrite 1,720
562% 2,486 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 67.8
234% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 649
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 554
424% 576 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 300%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 44.1
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 106%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 54 60 17.2" 1280 720 BOE09F9
Typical MS-17K4 Builds (Compare 1,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-17K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback