Today's hottest deals

Medion E15301

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E15301  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NS15AP
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 15:30
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 158
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 470
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 18.9
11% 14.5 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 10.6
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD-B47 256GB
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 409 412 429 422 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 430
Mixed 369
SusWrite 415
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 33.7
130% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 166
140% 202 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 197 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO4999
Typical E15301 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15301

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback