Today's hottest deals

HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A3E
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230420
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 04:50
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 153
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 740
69% 572 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
HP(103C 8A3E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.02.07
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 38.4
32% 41.3 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 38
34% 42 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFH-1BC1AABHA 512GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 610 708 733 719 704 705 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 950
Write 794
Mixed 776
SusWrite 696
181% 804 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 37.3
123% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 534
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 422
294% 378 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MR-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1536 793 BOE09CA
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback