Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JA
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 17:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 184
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 236
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 14F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.53 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P32A8-256GC1 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 372 373 344 299 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 724
Write 328
Mixed 266
SusWrite 344
92% 416 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 7
51% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 265
205% 276 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD4S3200J4G22-BHYD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07AA
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback