Jp.ik SF20GM7-2023

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemJp.ik SF20GM7-2023  (all builds)
MotherboardJP.ik SF20GM7-2023
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221018
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 22:21
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 31.7
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 43
26% 40.9 Pts
4-Core 43.1
8-Core 43.9
6% 43.5 Pts
64-Core 40
2% 40 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.9
Write 5.3
Mixed 9.5
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.3
67% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMB6-5GDA1BAR01A00 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.57% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 4.6
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 28 60 11.6" 1280 720 STA0004
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback