Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateSep 23 '23 at 15:34
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 130
57% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 394
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX590 GME
Gigabyte(1458 2323) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 93.9
58% 76 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 47.9
51% 64.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kllisre 128GB 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 280 239 139 190 266 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,446
Write 479
Mixed 628
SusWrite 214
152% 692 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 21.3
116% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 337
256% 347 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 121%
Great: 173%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
111GB free
Firmware: 77.04E.B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 86 84 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 87.7
Write 85.4
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 76.7
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF51272PY 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 12.6" 1280 720 NCS2275
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback