Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core 82 User benchmarks, average bench 62% P0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 50.3 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 124 48% 83.1 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 458 42% 349 Pts	64-Core 2,150 133% 2,150 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 407 402 404 402 406 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2020 Write 1,932 Mixed 1,222 SusWrite 441 313% 1,404 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 68.8 234% 84.1 MB/s	DQ Read 954 DQ Write 872 DQ Mixed 928 692% 918 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 302%
Samsung MZWLJ1T9HBJR-00007 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 304% 602GB free Firmware: EPK98B5Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1545 1631 1584 1534 1612 1549 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 975 Write 2,294 Mixed 1,196 SusWrite 1576 344% 1,510 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 57.2 197% 72.9 MB/s	DQ Read 953 DQ Write 875 DQ Mixed 909 683% 912 MB/s
Poor: 237% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 345%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965694-009.B00G 4x31.8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	MC Read 36.4 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 39 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 22.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 151%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	24	8	0	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16