Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-N305 282 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 59.1 2-Core 142 47% 84.6 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 390 37% 308 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA256TFK 256GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: V5MA010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 279 290 281 319 298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 505 Write 660 Mixed 402 SusWrite 291 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 18.4 64% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 490 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 154 158% 267 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 250%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 24.1 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 10.6 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 267 15% 267 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	26	20	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 6%, 345 samples	62x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 1,086 samples	3x

SSD
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA256TFK 256GBBench 158%, 336 samples	24x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GBBench 203%, 4,667 samples	23x
OM8SEP4256Q-AA 256GBKingstonBench 149%, 20 samples	10x

RAM
H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GBHynixBench 70%, 83 samples	38x
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GBMicronBench 68%, 149 samples	11x
K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 4x2GBSamsungBench 58%, 138 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16