Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 26 '23 at 18:53
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 221
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 359
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 53.1
50% 67.9 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 63.4
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 305 289 307 308 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 665
Write 600
Mixed 573
SusWrite 299
120% 534 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 45.7
146% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 510
391% 540 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 115%
Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$279
717GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 136 147 143 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 335
Write 413
Mixed 344
SusWrite 139
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 34.5
116% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 139
150% 251 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 91 92 99 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 81.4
Write 111
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 93.4
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
794GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 124 122 131 133 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 122
Write 47.9
Mixed 73
SusWrite 123
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 48 60 24" 1920 1017 SAM07D6 SA300/350/360
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback