MSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7597
MotherboardMSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 01:09
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 44
2-Core 79.3
43% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 172
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 2731) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37240 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 36 38 160 76 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 217
Write 116
Mixed 146
SusWrite 82.8
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 19.4
67% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 47.4
DQ Mixed 23.9
21% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 13
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 14 60 25" 1280 720 HWP283B HP 2509
Typical NF725M-P43 (MS-7597) Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI NF725M-P43 (MS-7597)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback