Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive522% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi Carrara  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Memory50.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 09:31
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 215
2-Core 428
122% 239 Pts
4-Core 838
8-Core 1,658
147% 1,248 Pts
64-Core 3,764
233% 3,764 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 147
Parallax 147
108% 142 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 124
104% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$269
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4272 776 758 1430 1967 2091 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
522% Outstanding
Read 6,114
Write 3,900
Mixed 3,714
SusWrite 1,882
867% 3,902 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 60.9
290% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,896
DQ Write 1529
DQ Mixed 1,777
1,313% 1,734 MB/s
Poor: 475%
This bench: 522%
Great: 926%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 169 179 145 178 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 182
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 172
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF572C38-16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 45.9
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 42.7
124% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 43.2
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 42.6
124% 43.4 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 213%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C3 MX279
Typical X670E Taichi Carrara Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $2,170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback