HP ZBook Studio G4

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ZBook Studio G4 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 826B
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230616
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '23 at 17:11
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 39.5 2-Core 147 53% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 366 27% 244 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200 4,250 User benchmarks, average bench 15% HP(103C 826D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.69 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.7% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 14.9 8% 13.4 fps	MRender 19.5 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 13.5 13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.7% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
VT-VLW512 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1021B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 12 183 28 4.4 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 365 Write 330 Mixed 334 SusWrite 45.6 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 10.5 54% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 42.1 84% 165 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 76%
VT-VLW512 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 368GB free Firmware: V1021B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 356 356 345 349 359 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 403 Write 345 Mixed 333 SusWrite 354 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 15.6 66% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 42.9 91% 182 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 44,819 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 12.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 15.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	15.5"	1536 801	LGD057E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBook Studio G4 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G4

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	153x
Core i7-7820HQIntelBench 63%, 15,851 samples	102x
Xeon E3-1505M v6IntelBench 70%, 4,124 samples	61x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	156x
Quadro M1200NvidiaBench 15%, 4,250 samples	132x
HD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 3,370 samples	39x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	82x
MZVLW512HMJP-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 194%, 850 samples	41x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	28x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBHynixBench 73%, 6,356 samples	26x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	22x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16