Today's hottest deals

Americanmegatrends E5 Ver:3.2S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAmericanmegatrends E5 Ver:3.2S  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 12:50
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 192
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 667
63% 523 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 75.3
42% 61.8 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 42.4
43% 53.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256G 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0721A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 195 314 199 349 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,784
Write 1,541
Mixed 1,162
SusWrite 310
267% 1,199 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 24.6
120% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 380
280% 372 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 142%
Great: 142%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 19" 1280 720 GSM4AF2 L1919S
Typical E5 Ver:3.2S Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Americanmegatrends E5 Ver:3.2S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback