Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211213
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '23 at 20:46
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 63 1-Core 116 2-Core 246 75% 142 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 808 71% 603 Pts	64-Core 1,955 121% 1,955 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3745) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.9% Outstanding	Lighting 112 Reflection 122 Parallax 111 91% 115 fps	MRender 93.4 Gravity 126 Splatting 111 91% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1490 1493 1521 1938 1655 1892 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	258% Outstanding	Read 1,785 Write 1,301 Mixed 1,038 SusWrite 1,664 325% 1,447 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 54.7 169% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 957 DQ Write 487 DQ Mixed 674 514% 706 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 258% Great: 526%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA2000CM10002 2TB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2TB free Firmware: STAS1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 326 336 420 367 409 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 248 Write 239 Mixed 298 SusWrite 365 65% 288 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 19.9 88% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 226 203% 306 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 113%
ROG ESD-S1C 2TB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 161 167 210 182 202 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 272 Write 295 Mixed 256 SusWrite 182 57% 251 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 15.1 51% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 215 158% 207 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 22GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 331 338 425 374 412 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 292 Write 238 Mixed 346 SusWrite 370 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 26.7 112% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 356 265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 133%
Asmt ASMT105 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 111 135 126 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 108 Write 102 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 121 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 102%
Amd-raid ST14000NM001G-2K 14TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 791GB free Firmware: SN03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 86 96 82 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 66.7 Write 71.8 Mixed 70 SusWrite 84 54% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 350% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 138%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 98 118 111 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 89.7 Write 105 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 108 59% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.4 186% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$131 396 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 544GB free Firmware: DN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 93 91 107 98 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 119 Write 81.9 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 99.2 70% 95 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.9 391% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 8,912 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.1% Very good	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 29.2 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	27"	1920 1057	AUS27D2 ASUS VA27EHE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)