Lenovo 10A6S01800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10A6S01800  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180821
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 04:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 182
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 265
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
USB DISK 3.2 250GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 369 370 345 280 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 261
Write 306
Mixed 270
SusWrite 348
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 19
62% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 132
100% 135 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 32.2
Write 36.6
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 39.3
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback