Today's hottest deals

LG 16Z90R-G.AD75F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemLG 16Z90R-G.AD75F  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 16Z90R
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230203
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 70.7
1-Core 202
2-Core 389
114% 221 Pts
4-Core 713
8-Core 1065
111% 889 Pts
64-Core 1,388
86% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1854 0488) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 24.4
18% 24.4 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 29
Splatting 20.6
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,045
Write 2,074
Mixed 1,826
512% 2,315 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 77.5
239% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 731
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 611
434% 563 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
155% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 69.2
MC Mixed 59.3
175% 61.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 24.4
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 155%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 16" 1280 720 LGD06EB
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback