Asrock H67M-GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H67M-GE  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '17 at 20:31
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 332
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB; M-NGTX1060/5REHDPPP-F339G, Manli GTX 1060 6 GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.7% Average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 76.2
Parallax 73.8
32% 63.2 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 68.8
57% 70 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 412
Mixed 422
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 39.4
141% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 114
140% 248 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
176GB free
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 95.7
Mixed 88.3
66% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.34
87% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG CM3X2G1333C9 Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 17.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-GE Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-GE - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback