Today's hottest deals

HP 348 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 348 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8194
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 17:22
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 141
59% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 203
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 M330
HP(103C 8194) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.1034.6
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6
Parallax 8.2
5% 6.63 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 6.4
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKB240G8 240GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XC311102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 222 228 232 250 244 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 289
Write 157
Mixed 257
SusWrite 232
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 26.7
96% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 227
178% 248 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 100 27" 1280 720 ACR0B0A SA272
Typical 348 G3 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 348 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback