ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hitachi HA8000/RS220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hitachi HA8000/RS220 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 7TTSHEa
Memory	20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110224
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '17 at 02:49
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 61.1 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 119 47% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 469 41% 351 Pts	64-Core 616 38% 616 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MR9266-8i 525GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 443GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.15 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 444 Write 483 Mixed 475 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 16.6 82% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 58.2 51% 73 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 90%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 4TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 30.2 Mixed 31.8 24% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 6.17 4K Mixed 0.75 225% 2.52 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 119%
Asmt ASM1352R-Fast 16TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 33.9 Write 29.5 Mixed 30.9 24% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.85 4K Write 5.36 4K Mixed 0.68 418% 3.96 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 72%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 500GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 465GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 34 Write 29.6 Mixed 30.8 24% 31.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.65 132% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x8GB 7,706 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3 of 12 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback