HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887A
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 04:13
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 109
45% 75 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 315
32% 261 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 9
Parallax 15.6
4% 10 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 11.8
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSEJN512GA87EC0 512GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE36P01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 446 442 495 530 506 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 599
Write 539
Mixed 532
SusWrite 479
121% 537 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 17.7
62% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 242
163% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3320KE78HAF-3200 Adata 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 60 15.5" 1536 793 CMN153B
Typical Laptop 15s-eq2xxx Builds (Compare 1,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback