Today's hottest deals

GPD G1618-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemGPD G1618-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1618-04
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230918
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 03:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U w/ Radeon 760M Graphics
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 222
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 697
67% 555 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 760M
AMD(1002 15BF) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 30.9
14% 23.3 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 33.9
22% 25 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
762GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 70 84 334 82 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,818
Write 2,322
Mixed 1,421
SusWrite 210
323% 1,443 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 5.4
96% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 173
182% 317 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 129%
Great: 530%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 36.3
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 35.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 6" 1280 720 GPD0598 G1618-04
Typical G1618-04 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: GPD G1618-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback