Today's hottest deals

Medion ML-210007

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion ML-210007  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION E14409
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210226
Uptime149.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 16:41
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 102
2-Core 181
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 224
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(1E39 A030) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9837
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSN095SA328-Y01Q1I0 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 84 73 66 78 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 294
Write 288
Mixed 253
SusWrite 105
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 22.7
84% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 217
160% 208 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO440D85-2666E 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 7.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 14" 1280 720 KDB0827
Typical ML-210007 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Medion ML-210007

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback