Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 19:56
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 52.4
2-Core 98
49% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 143
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 39.6
31% 40.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 28.1
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Platinet 240GB 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 336 266 286 253 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79% Very good
Read 373
Write 280
Mixed 334
SusWrite 266
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 35.4
122% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 103
110% 182 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
139GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 105 106 107 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 72.7
Write 70.5
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 106
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
39GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 180 176 186 187 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 130
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 180
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 21.6" 1280 720 PHLC081 Philips 226VL
Typical GA-F2A75M-HD2 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $154
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback