Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1603QA
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 00:49
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 36.1
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 117
39% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 394
37% 307 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 12AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.99% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 31.4
7% 19.5 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10
10% 12 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.99%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 1TB 2G0C
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 236030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 269 243 312 284 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 783
Write 278
Mixed 406
SusWrite 276
96% 436 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 29
98% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 401
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 312
221% 287 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 24
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 16" 1280 720 AUO459D
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback