HP Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory1024GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1024GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88C1
Memory975.7 GB free of 1024 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '23 at 03:24
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.2% Good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 178
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 429
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0TFH-1BC1AABHA 1TB
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 381 381 375 381 375 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 503
Write 383
Mixed 412
SusWrite 378
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 5.1
18% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 496%
Crucial MTFDHBA2T0TDV-1AZ1AABHA 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPS0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 369 370 369 369 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 236
Write 699
Mixed 319
SusWrite 368
93% 405 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 4.4
15% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 366%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M321RAGA0B20-CWKZH 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
137% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 75.6
MC Mixed 50.7
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 28 6 0 0" 1280 720
Typical Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO

System: HP Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback