Metabox Prime-SR PD70PNT1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMetabox Prime-SR PD70PNT1  (all builds)
MotherboardIT PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 15:45
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 71.3
1-Core 193
2-Core 351
107% 205 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,026
103% 838 Pts
64-Core 1,519
94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 65F5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4952
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 29.6
21% 28.8 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 0
16% 22.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2241 2TB SSD
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS224C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 199 196 189 185 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,610
Write 634
Mixed 143
SusWrite 204
140% 648 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 3.5
154% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,100
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 295
385% 703 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 158%
Great: 542%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.M8FF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 36.7
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 165 17.2" 1707 889 BOE0A71
Typical Prime-SR PD70PNT1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

System: Metabox Prime-SR PD70PNT1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback