HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E1
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221128
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 20:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 230
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 809
76% 632 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEL1TB 1TB
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0818A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 15 16 84 259 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 438
Write 346
Mixed 368
SusWrite 113
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 21.6
89% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 48.3
80% 148 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 132 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 129
Write 128
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 132
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
249% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75%
Great: 107%
Jmicron Generic 4TB
367GB free
Firmware: 4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 84.1
Write 92.2
Mixed 75
SusWrite 101
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A5244CB0-CRC M391A5143EB1-CPB 16GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 0" 1280 720 VS24A
Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback