Asus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 03:38
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700-$344
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 54.2
1-Core 195
2-Core 402
108% 217 Pts
4-Core 732
8-Core 1,334
124% 1,033 Pts
64-Core 2,641
164% 2,641 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 126%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SEDC1000BM8960G 960GB
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECEK22.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 595 586 579 599 606 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 796
Write 819
Mixed 564
SusWrite 594
156% 693 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 36.5
175% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 640
480% 633 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 148%
Great: 206%
Kingston SEDC600M960G 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: SCEKH5.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 178 174 175 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 322
Write 314
Mixed 283
SusWrite 176
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 24.1
88% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 252
187% 246 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 120%
Kingston SEDC600M960G 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: SCEKH5.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 178 174 175 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 322
Write 319
Mixed 297
SusWrite 177
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 24.8
90% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 241
181% 243 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 120%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
783GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 155 153 149 151 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 165
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 151
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 150 148 151 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 138
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 150
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
905GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 166 163 164 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 194
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 166
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$23
918GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 150 150 151 151 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 173
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 151
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
207% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965794-016.A00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 36.9
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 104%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 32 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 451%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 595%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,951
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback