| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Xen HVM domU (all builds) |
| Motherboard | |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 11.9844 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160509 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 01 '18 at 17:04 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
|
52%
Above average
|
54% 95.9 Pts
|
37% 269 Pts
|
18% 288 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GRID M60-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 114E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.71
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.7%
Very poor
|
18% 21.9 fps
|
20% 23.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Xensrc PVDISK 129GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
|
27.1%
Poor
|
55% 246 MB/s
|
17% 4.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
|
46.1%
Average
|
49% 17.3 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
28% 144 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Xen HVM domU
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples | 16x |
| Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples | 14x |
| Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples | 9x |
| RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples | 7x |
| Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |