Thunderobot ZERO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Thunderobot ZERO (all builds)
Motherboard	THUNDEROBOT NLZE
Memory	23 GB free of 32 GB
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '23 at 20:00
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-13900HX 8,895 User benchmarks, average bench 115% U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Memory 21.1 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 76.6 25% 46.3 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 166 19% 148 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 120%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Quanta(152D 1500) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.6 1% 0.73 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KPEGYMTBW2U001TCJD 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 876GB free (System drive) Firmware: 229082AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 1010 1108 1008 1095 1123 1091 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 782 Write 909 Mixed 712 SusWrite 1,072 197% 869 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 17.3 61% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 136 106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 414%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GB 2,547 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 12.6 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6.1 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 369 11% 369 ns
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 179%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	9	161	15	240	16"	1280 720	BOE0B87

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZERO Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 107%

UFO

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Thunderobot ZERO

CPU
Core i9-13900HXIntelBench 115%, 8,895 samples	52x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	45x
Core i9-12900HIntelBench 99%, 15,403 samples	33x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	31x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 8%, 10,524 samples	28x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	22x

SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples	40x
CA6-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 295%, 1,235 samples	37x
KPEGYMTBW2U001TCJD 1TBBench 341%, 25 samples	25x

RAM
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GBSamsungBench 130%, 9,018 samples	34x
M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GBSamsungBench 149%, 2,547 samples	24x
AM1P32NC8T1-BDRS 2x8GBAdataBench 91%, 50 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16