Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30FMCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive355% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30FMCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1057
Memory112.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 09:34
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$274
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 70.6
1-Core 205
2-Core 409
116% 228 Pts
4-Core 798
8-Core 1,417
133% 1,108 Pts
64-Core 2,889
179% 2,889 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Legend(17AA 1057) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 11.1
8% 11.9 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7006P7LN Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2946 2954 2980 1643 1257 1266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 3,653
Write 2,869
Mixed 2,381
SusWrite 2,174
620% 2,769 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 56.2
193% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 557
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 381
281% 380 MB/s
Poor: 355%
This bench: 355%
Great: 459%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
540GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1840 1174 1238 1202 1190 1194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,288
Write 1,948
Mixed 2,257
SusWrite 1,306
438% 1,950 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 54
179% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,133
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 360
340% 558 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 256%
Great: 321%
WDC WD10SPSX-08A6W 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 137 138 137 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 138
Write 111
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 136
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.9
7% 3.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 0.9
3% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 173 174 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 113
Mixed 115
SusWrite 173
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
1,474% 12 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 99%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix CG88MEBEA081N 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.3
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 42.5
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 28.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 28.8" 1280 720 LEN66E5 L29w-30
Typical 30FMCTO1WW Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30FMCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback