HP Z230 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z230 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1905
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 21:52
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 128
61% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 190
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 27
Parallax 18.6
16% 21.8 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 19.5
18% 23.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 374
Write 135
Mixed 110
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 16.4
84% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 48.3
83% 167 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5458-001.A00LF 0423 Team--Elite-1333 0423 Team--Elite-1333 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 3R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 17% 53 190 59 60 23.5" 1920 1009 PHLC0E7 PHL 247E6
Typical Z230 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 2,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback