Lenovo 83ER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83ER  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 53.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 299
88% 171 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 692
73% 585 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 384A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.01% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 10.3
7% 10.7 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD1T0QFM-1BD1AABLA 1TB
909GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1001V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 1089 1071 1178 1225 1116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 846
Write 1,230
Mixed 675
SusWrite 1,108
218% 965 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 18.3
106% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 353
275% 389 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 150%
Great: 395%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
134% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 58.2
MC Mixed 52.9
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 134%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9052
Typical 83ER Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83ER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback