N/A N/A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemN/A N/A  (all builds)
MotherboardN/A N/A
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 13:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 35.2
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 90.7
32% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 120
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4
Parallax 3
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 6.9
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ipason P100 512GB M.2 SATA
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230523a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 321 291 300 310 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 303
Write 250
Mixed 280
SusWrite 307
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 19.1
66% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 177
131% 174 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 5 0 14" 1280 720 HSD0001
Typical N/A Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: N/A N/A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback