Today's hottest deals

SGIN X15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSGIN X15  (all builds)
MotherboardSGIN X15
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230327
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 02:28
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 129
45% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 169
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
G521n 512G 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 236 310 261 319 331 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
Read 338
Write 324
Mixed 252
SusWrite 284
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 8.1
59% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 13.4
58% 128 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x12GB
1 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0936
Typical X15 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: SGIN X15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback