User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAZERTY
MotherboardAZERTY B75
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 15:09
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 162
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 276
38% 280 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 75.3
45% 64.6 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 54.8
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bestoss S201 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227P
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 233
Write 210
Mixed 195
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 13.1
80% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 17.2
46% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 78%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
335GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.4
Write 63.4
Mixed 36.4
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
DGMAD31333004D COMPIT 12GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 0P 5R 8G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 19% 123 211 59 75 21.7" 1280 720 SAM08AA S22B300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback