Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 41.1 1-Core 58.6 2-Core 73.8 35% 57.8 Pts	4-Core 79 8-Core 79 11% 79 Pts	64-Core 79.6 5% 79.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.5% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.5% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Phison SM8480GPMTCB47BECS-S114LC 480GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMT1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 283 270 309 311 357 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.5% Good	Read 354 Write 123 Mixed 296 SusWrite 302 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 25.1 88% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 138 107% 148 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.1 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	39	9	60	11.6"	1280 720	KDB1120

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	13x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	13x

SSD
480GB 480GBKimtigoBench 65%, 35 samples	6x
Forza NSN135SA348-I01S400 480GBNeoBench 52%, 3 samples	4x
SM8480GPMTCB47BECS-S114LC 480GBPhisonBench 52%, 2 samples	2x

RAM
NMSO480E82-2666E 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 42 samples	5x
NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GBUnknownBench 36%, 145 samples	5x
CMB6-5GDA1BAR01A00 1x8GBCorsairBench 33%, 25 samples	2x