TR ST Plus-KN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemTR ST Plus-KN  (all builds)
MotherboardTR ST Plus-KN
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '18 at 16:45
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 99.2
49% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 292
28% 233 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 1.41
1% 4.65 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.61
2% 2.02 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV5-8Q256 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A882101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 500
Write 215
Mixed 304
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 10.8
53% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 69.1
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 50.4
54% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 75.1
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.59
4K Write 3.46
4K Mixed 0.41
175% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD1 Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ST Plus-KN Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: TR ST Plus-KN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback