Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive468% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 04:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 70.6
1-Core 197
2-Core 383
112% 217 Pts
4-Core 736
8-Core 1,367
126% 1,052 Pts
64-Core 2337
145% 2337 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 170F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 11.5
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-1T00-1014 1TB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61470100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3953 4102 2887 1520 1681 1783 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
468% Outstanding
Read 3,618
Write 3,824
Mixed 2,860
SusWrite 2,654
729% 3,239 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 72.1
317% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,557
DQ Write 1,417
DQ Mixed 1,516
1,129% 1,497 MB/s
Poor: 329%
This bench: 468%
Great: 605%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 44.5
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 25.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 120%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A2C
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback