Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SE  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 20:15
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 44
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 136
46% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 460
43% 356 Pts
64-Core 950
59% 950 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 1546) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1368
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 2
9% 8.63 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 8.4
9% 11 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1592 1570 1522 1420 1174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,245
Write 1,509
Mixed 1,341
SusWrite 1,443
314% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 43.4
135% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 468
337% 438 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 199%
Great: 421%
WD Green SN350 1TB
582GB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 1138 1283 1241 1160 1200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,942
Write 11.7
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 1,143
281% 1,291 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 8.4
64% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 12.5
79% 198 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 218%
Great: 350%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 30.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 17 360 15.5" 1280 720 SHP153F LQ156M1JW30
Typical GA-AORUS 5 SE Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback