Lenovo 83AA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 83AA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2944 x 1840 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231010
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 16:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S 780M Graphics
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 64.5
1-Core 184
2-Core 369
105% 206 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,231
120% 985 Pts
64-Core 1,258
78% 1,258 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3C99) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.40.05.01
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 66.7
23% 40.1 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 68
42% 48.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51020A12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,313
Write 3,755
Mixed 2,892
812% 3,653 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 98.6
330% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,268
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 1,127
820% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 549%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 64.2
MC Mixed 53.8
155% 54.1 GB/s
SC Read 39.9
SC Write 53
SC Mixed 48.8
135% 47.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 147%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 90 14.5" 1280 720 LEN8AAE
Typical 83AA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 83AA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback