Today's hottest deals

Partner TIGERLAKE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemPartner TIGERLAKE  (all builds)
MotherboardPartner TIGERLAKE
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 10:04
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i3-1115G4E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 93.2
43% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 106
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 5.6
4% 6.5 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5
Splatting 5.8
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4128P-A0 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFKBO.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 810 828 651 393 185 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 975
Write 890
Mixed 918
SusWrite 494
184% 819 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 77.8
254% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 326
244% 328 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 163%
Great: 202%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 12.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 8.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 LEN62A8 C24-20
Typical TIGERLAKE Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Partner TIGERLAKE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback