Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5500U 73,655 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 109 53% 84.4 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 163 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3820) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.45% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 3.5 2% 2.8 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 3 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.45% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hy-vs-820 PRO 512G 512GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2105XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 264 287 284 343 336 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 378 Write 262 Mixed 271 SusWrite 298 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 1.2 48% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 85.3 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 152 112% 142 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.1% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 7.6 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 8 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	13.9"	1280 720	CMN14A7

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	57x
GTX 940MNvidiaBench 9%, 15,731 samples	6x
GeForce 920MNvidiaBench 5%, 11,731 samples	5x

SSD
RTNMB256VBM8EWXL 256GBBench 60%, 327 samples	9x
MZYTE256HMHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 69%, 950 samples	5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $40Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	14x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	12x
RMT3160ME68FAF1600 1x8GBRamaxelBench 28%, 6,313 samples	10x