Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi Carrara  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Memory42.7 GB free of 48 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 05:54
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$444
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 36.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 259
74% 147 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 798
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,272
79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 63%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,128
Write 1,926
Mixed 1,851
370% 1,635 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 43.7
139% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1386
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 1,128
828% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 401
Mixed 361
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 17.6
92% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 26.6
79% 167 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 415020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 317
Write 333
Mixed 324
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 30.1
103% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 243
209% 309 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 117%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.9
Write 89.6
Mixed 53.2
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 225
Write 177
Mixed 104
125% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 79.2
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 72%
Patriot Memory 16GB
10GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 44.1
Mixed 45.5
71% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
91% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-8000J4048F24G 2x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
144% Outstanding
MC Read 62.4
MC Write 50.1
MC Mixed 57.9
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 30.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 144%
Great: 281%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 8 64 0" 1707 960
Typical X670E Taichi Carrara Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 298%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 375%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,828
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback