Lenovo INVALID

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo INVALID  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory14.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 15:27
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Memory 11.1
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 17.1
8% 12.9 Pts
4-Core 29.9
8-Core 37.2
4% 33.5 Pts
64-Core 47
3% 47 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 39B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 202 262 301 273 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 297
Write 279
Mixed 282
SusWrite 259
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 8.2
27% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 059B CT16G4SFD824A 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 446
9% 446 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 24 60 15.5" 1536 793 BOE0729
Typical INVALID Builds (Compare 2,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo INVALID

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback