HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231016
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 20:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 529
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 1859 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 45.3
Parallax 41.4
32% 42.1 fps
MRender 40.8
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 30.3
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GO INFINITY-512GB 512GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 367 360 164 109 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 427
Write 327
Mixed 318
SusWrite 219
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 22.3
93% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 45.1
92% 185 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU7AFR8N-UH HMA82GU7CJR8N-VK 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 0P 5R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 15% 109 379 95 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0659 SAMSUNG
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback