HP EliteDesk 800 G1 USDT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 USDT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E5
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 19:04
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 178
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 334
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.2
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 512GB 512GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3105A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 315 128 156 53 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 346
Write 332
Mixed 260
SusWrite 167
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 10.6
80% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 13.6
23% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 20 60 15.5" 1280 720 BNQ785B BenQ G610HDAL
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 USDT Builds (Compare 763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 USDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback