Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Stonic_RNS
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 05:58
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 79.4
38% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 628
45% 414 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1447) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 54.2
46% 58 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 45.4
43% 53.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 47%
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Acer(1025 1455) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.22.03
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20.5
13% 17.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 17
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1014 1TB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 792 732 371 388 395 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,222
Write 1,190
Mixed 1,039
SusWrite 637
230% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 22.8
86% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 461
349% 474 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 264%
Lexar 250GB SSD 250GB
101GB free
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 308 224 109 120 221 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 1,083
Write 468
Mixed 675
SusWrite 235
136% 615 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 17.6
82% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 329
265% 371 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C8FJ Kingston ACR32D4S2S1ME-8 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 24.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 30 27" 1280 720 ACR074F KG271 P
Typical Nitro AN515-44 Builds (Compare 1,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback