Gigabyte GA-A620M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A620M H  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 21:41
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 165
2-Core 337
99% 191 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 897
91% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 114%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 231 213 243 258 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 301
Mixed 369
SusWrite 236
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 54.2
180% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 160
179% 303 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
WD Blue SN580 1TB
867GB free
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1712 1655 1586 1746 1727 1759 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 3,357
Write 3,268
Mixed 2,375
SusWrite 1,697
600% 2,674 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 80
291% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 2,044
DQ Write 1,808
DQ Mixed 1,902
1,433% 1,918 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 413%
Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5U56008G-B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 39.5
112% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 35.9
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 40.6
114% 40.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 11 64 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-A620M H Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A620M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback